Web Constitutions

3 May

The article, Social Software and the Politics of Groups, is my first experience of a doomsday perspective by Clay Shirky. He seems concerned. Concerned that the web, and the social software living in it, is reaching a point where a healthy dose of focus is needed to prevent it from fizzling out.

In his article, Shirky differentiates the internet from earlier media (printing press, telegraph, radio, etc.) as a structure on which conversations can occur “among many people at once”. He notes “the radical change was de-coupling groups in space and time”, allowing for these conversations to happen. Shirky also reminds us that social software is still relatively new. He says “we are still learning how to build and use the software-defined conference tables and campfires we’re gathering around”.

As we know from Shirky’s Here Comes Everybody, he is a big believer in the power of crowdsourcing and collaborative efforts online. He suggests that groups exhibit different behaviours that “cannot be predicted by examining the individuals in isolation” and that this creates a design problem for social software. Social software had been created on the assumptions that groups can be of unlimited size, offer unlimited access and not hold the individual to a higher-level duty or common good.

Shirky suggests that because “the network is now a global metropolis”, these criteria need to change in order to protect groups. Wikipedia is an example of the kind of group that has done well in the current online reality – those that limit growth or restrict size, have barriers to joining or obtaining status as a “good member”, and impose enforceable norms for the good of the community. From what I understand, this supports the notion of the Semantic Web coined by Tim Berners-Lee.

These barriers are referred to as examples of “constitutions”, hence the article’s title, that govern software or groups like Wikipedia. Of course, this governance creates a culture. When we say so and so is a “Wikipedian”, it means something.

Shirky gives examples of constitutions that exist or could exist, such as Slashdot. He also recognizes “that the individual’s reaction to the software is the critical factor” – individual needs must be met while creating these constitutions. Further, he gives ideas for creating barriers that might be a component of such constitutions.

While this language of organization and politics seems to contravene open-source thinking, it does make sense in the bigger picture. Perhaps Shirky isn’t being all doom and gloom after all – he may just be saying what needs to be said.


4 Responses to “Web Constitutions”

  1. leahmcyyc May 3, 2012 at 10:03 pm #

    Great post Mark! It took me off guard how concerned Shirky was; he certainly has gotten more optimistic in recent times with the development of social media tools. However he is right to still be concerned about the creation and protection of networks and the freedom to collaborate as seen in his vocal opponence with SOPA/PIPA.

    • marcbavin May 4, 2012 at 4:07 am #

      Thanks for your comment Leah! Definitely agree, thought meanwhile it seems like Benkler (as I am reading now) is not as concerned – guess we’ll find out tomorrow.

  2. Andrea May 4, 2012 at 3:04 am #

    I really liked your insight on this article Marc, as we have clearly known what Shirky is like in a more recent context, this earlier context is very interesting indeed. Considering how crazy the whole world has become with social software and increasing policy to try and shut down the idea of sharing and copyright infringement, I’d think Shirky would be more stressed now then he was back then.

    • marcbavin May 4, 2012 at 4:11 am #

      I know, you would think he’d be looking back and thinking 2003 was a cake walk!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: